Healthy
Information
A Claremont Library
Resource Project
Created by Holly Mair, Teacher-Librarian
for Planning 10 and Graduation
Portfolio
Health awareness is a growing concern amongst Canadians.
As the desire for knowledge increases, so does the amount of
information that is published in books and on the Internet.
Unfortunately not all of the information is medically accurate and some
of it can actually damage a persons health.
In this lesson you will learn ways in which you can detect the
fraud so you can be assured that the information you access is correct.
Prescribed Learning Outcomes:
(Planning 10)
1.
Assess the validity of collected health information by:
determining examples of bias and points of view in health information
checking references to determine the professional affiliations of the
producer/author
investigating funding sources/affiliations of information
determining the currency of information
determining consistency of information obtained from other sources on same
topic
(Portfolio Core Aspect 5.1)
Demonstrates use of computer
technology to complete a task such as a school assignment or a home or
community-based project.
Demonstrates that you have followed school policies regarding appropriate/sage
care/use of basic computer equipment and Internet privileges
Demonstrates use of basic navigation, keyboarding and file management skills
Demonstrates use of basic word processing or spreadsheet software.
Demonstrates that you can use the Internet to find information.
Task:
1.
You and a partner will be examining at least three
Internet-based health-related resources.
As you examine them, you will be completing an evaluation chart for
each website.
2.
After carefully
completing 3 chart evaluations, you and your partner will assess the resources
on the basis of their accuracy and helpfulness.
3.
Select the best site of the three you researched. You will be
word processing a one-page statement on why you selected that particular
resource and explain why it was superior to the others.
Materials:
Each group will need:
-
a
computer
-
Three Internet Sites
Two
sites MUST be from the list created by the Teacher-Librarian (see the
library homepage http://www.claremont-school.ca/lrc/aprjlin1.html#CAPP)
One site will be a free choice site that you and your partner find.
-
three copies of the evaluation form, one for each of the
three sites you assess.
Final Product and Evaluation:
15
Complete three health resource evaluation sheets.
Point form is allowed (5 marks each)
20
In a one-page Learning Log response, clearly state which resource you
selected as the most accurate and helpful. Put the point form information you
have on your resource evaluation sheets into sentences.
You will be word processing this document, saving it to disk and
printing a copy to submit for marking.
Criteria for Learning Log Response
1.
Relates a thoughtful reaction revealing understanding
2.
Views and opinions are supported by examples and explanations
3.
Makes connections to life experiences and other learning
4.
Demonstrates ability to Word Process
Total Marks 35
|
|
|
W=Weak
S=Strong
|
|
Is
the resource credible?
|
|
(Give
Point-Form Reasons by questions)
|
|
|
·
Is the authors name (or
the name of the organization responsible for the document) clearly stated?
·
If the author is identified,
is he or she a professional or accredited authority on the subject?
·
If an organization is
responsible for the information, is it a reputable organization recognized
as an authority on the subject?
·
If medical information is
given by a non-professional, is this clearly said?
·
What kinds of evidence are
provided to endorse a specific treatment or service?
·
Does the site provide
contact information about the author (for example, full name, address,
phone number, e-mail address)?
|
W
S
|
|
Is the content suitable?
|
|
|
|
|
·
Does the content discuss the
issue(s) youre interested in?
·
Is there enough detail or
does the information seem superficial?
·
Does the resource have
original content or does it only link to other sites?
|
W
S
|
|
Are there clear caution
statements?
|
|
|
|
|
·
Does the resource offer a
clear statement that health information should not be taken as health
advice or a substitute for visiting a health professional?
·
If there are fees associated
with use of the resources on the site, are they clearly explained?
|
W
S
|
|
Is the resource
user-friendly?
|
|
|
|
|
·
Is the information presented
in a clear manner?
·
Can you contact the
author/administrator by e-mail if you have difficulties using the site?
|
W
S
|
|
Is
there clear & adequate disclosure?
|
·
|
|
|
|
·
Does the author have a
hidden intent (ex. trying to sell you something)?
·
Are both (or all) sides of
the issue presented?
·
If not, does the resource
state that it presents only one side of an issue? (For example, an
anti-abortion site should make its politics clear and not present itself
as a family planning site.)
·
Are commercial links and/or
sponsorships clearly stated?
·
Are these sponsorships
separate from the health information content?
·
If the site collects or
requests information about you, do they tell you exactly why they want
this information?
·
Are their privacy guidelines
stated?
·
If you have to register to
use the site, is the reason clear and your privacy ensured?
|
W
S
|
|
Is the information relevant
to you?
|
|
|
|
|
·
Does it match what you are
looking for?
·
Is the information presented
within a Canadian context?
|
W
S
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
..
..
..
..
..
.