|
Introduction |
Task
| Process | Evaluation
| Conclusion | Credits


As council for the Emperor Constantine the Great you have been
selected to prepare arguments as to whether gladiatorial shows should
continue or be banished from the Roman empire. It is your
responsibility to research gladiatorial shows and come up with arguments
to be used in a courtroom trial, which will help Emperor Constantine the
Great decide whether or not to ban the shows. Keep in mind that
lawyers who fail to perform their duties to the highest standards face
prison or in some cases, death. Many of the arguments for
gladiatorial shows has already been prepared by the first legal team and
it is your responsibility to develop the counter-arguments. As
council for the Emperor you will not know which side of the argument you
will be presenting until the day before the trial (Insert date here) so
consider all aspect of this argument. Research in small groups of
two or three and prepare your counter-arguments well, for your life may
depend on it!


You as legal council to the Emperor must prepare counter-arguments
against the continuation of the gladiatorial shows.
Following this preparation, the Emperor's legal team will be randomly
divided into two separate groups and prepare arguments in a courtroom,
to determine the fate of gladiatorial shows. The emperor himself
will preside over this special trial and after hearing all arguments
will determine if gladiatorial shows shall continue or not.

Councilor your assignment is as follows:
- First you'll be assigned to a team of two or three.
- Once you've formed your sub-legal group you must first study how
to create effective counter-arguments. Click here to learn
about counter-arguments and how to make them effective.
- You are now prepared in the art of forming counter-arguments and
must begin the research process, visit the sites below to learn
about the Roman gladiatorial shows. This is what lawyers
describe as a first reading. The first reading will allow you
to absorb the main details of the situation and provide you with
enough knowledge to begin the drafting stage. You will have to
revisit these sites after stage 6 to gain more detail.
Reading
Resource
http://www.salariya.com/web_books/gladiator/index.html
http://vroma.org/%7Ebmcmanus/arena.html
http://ga.essortment.com/romangladiators_rfye.htm
http://fortunecity.com/underworld/straif/69/enggladiat.htm
http://abacus.bates.edu/~mimber/Rciv/gladiator.htm
http://www.murphsplace.com/gladiator/glads.html
http://ablemedia.com/ctcweb/consortium/gladiators.html
http://encarta.msn.com/encnet/features/reference.aspx
Consider trying your own search:
http://www.yahoo.com/
http://www.google.ca/
- You must now begin the drafting process. Due to the large
number of sub-legal groups working on the same task it will be more
efficient if you all use the same layout. Click here to
view and print
out the Counter-argument layout.
- Read over the arguments made for the continuation of gladiatorial
shows. Begin conferencing with your sub-legal group
colleagues. You may need to keep a separate sheet for
initial/additional notes.
- Brainstorm counter-arguments. Refer back to step 3's
resource sites as often as need and don't forget the tips outlined
in step 2 (fair to everyone, side effects, consequences if everyone
acted the same, less damaging solutions).
- Head council for the emperor will review your final drafts on
(insert date here) for criteria listed under Evaluation. You
may want to examine the criteria before beginning your final draft.
- Record your final draft on the sheet provided. Click here.
- Complete Group-evaluation form.

Your project will be evaluated in three stages.
First, in the final stage of the project you will complete an
individual self-evaluation and a group
self-evaluation. Click here to see Individual self-evaluation form. Click
here to see group self-evaluation.
Second, the head council (teacher) will complete the following
rubric as a group marked project.
|
|
Beginning
1
|
Developing
2
|
Accomplished
3
|
Comments |
Score
|
|
Content
|
Project contains some
plausible counter-arguments, not every argument is countered. |
Project contains a
minimum of one plausible counter-argument for each argument.
Some effort has been made to supply 2 additional arguments.
|
Project contains two
plausible counter-arguments for each argument. Two
additional arguments supplied in lay-out. |
|
|
|
Amount of Research
|
Websites not researched
adequately
|
Some effort in
researching websites
|
Websites researched
adequately
|
|
|
|
Composition contains many
errors
|
Composition contains few
errors
|
Composition contains
little or no errors
|
|
|
|
Group-evaluation
|
Group evaluation
completed with little thought or reflection. |
Group evaluation
completed with reasonable thought and reflection. |
Group evaluation
completed with exceptional thought and reflection. |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Third, you will receive an individual participation mark for
your participation in the trial. Your Participation mark will be
out of three and the criteria is as follows.
0 = Did not participate in trial 1 = participated
in preparation but did not speak 2 = participated in
preparation and spoke at least one argument. 3
= participated in trial preparation and spoke to more than one
argument/point.

Congratulations you are finished! The Emperor looks forward to
the next debate/trial and hearing your input.
How do you feel
about this law...
1. A dreadfully deformed child shall be quickly killed.
Consider these questions:
Given the attitudes toward life and death at the time, should we
excuse the rulers for their promotion of gladiator shows?
Is it fair to apply modern standards of right and wrong to people
living in different conditions many hundreds of years ago?

Images acquired from the following sites:
http://www.greatbuildings.com/buildings/Roman_Colosseum.html
http://www.esc2.net/TIELevel2/projects/rome/
http://www.42explore.com/rome.htm
http://www.ettc.net/contest00/ferguson/home.html
http://www.barker.nsw.edu.au/library/Webquests/History/Gladiators/Index.htm
Resources:
Harrison, Smith, and Wright, eds. Critical
Challenges in Social Studies for Upper Elementary Students. Critical
Challenges Across the Curriculum Series. The Critical Thinking
Cooperative, 1999.
Thanks:
Thank you to Holly Mair for her encouragement and input.
Thank you to The WebQuest Page for so many great ideas and tips.
The
WebQuest Page
Design
Patterns
"We all benefit by being generous with our work. Permission is
hereby granted for other educators to copy this WebQuest, update or
otherwise modify it, and post it elsewhere provided that the original
author's name is retained along with a link back to the original URL of
this WebQuest. On the line after the original author's name, you may add
Modified by (your name) on (date)."

Last updated on (put date here). Based on a template
from The WebQuest
Page
|